2.1 Instructional Assessments
Evaluation for 2.1a
Materials include a variety of instructional assessments at the unit and lesson level (including diagnostic, formative, and summative) that vary in types of tasks and questions.
- The materials include diagnostic assessments at the unit level that vary in tasks and questions. For example, in the “Appendix: Progress Monitoring; Overview and Readiness Assessments”, each unit starts with a pre-unit diagnostic assessment titled “Unit Overview and Readiness”, consisting of three questions addressing prerequisite concepts and skills for the unit.
- The materials include formative and summative assessments that vary in tasks and questions at the lesson level. The “Appendix: Course Design” includes “Cool Down” tasks at the end of primary learning activities or lessons, serving as brief formative assessments to check students' understanding.
- The materials include various types of formative assessments within lessons. In “Unit 1: Teacher Guide; Lesson 1.1: Exploring Expressions and Equations”, activities like self-checks, card sorts, and student discourse provide multiple opportunities for formative assessment, allowing teachers to gauge student understanding and progress continuously.
- The materials include diagnostic assessments at the lesson level that vary in tasks and questions. For example, in “Lesson 8.2: When and Why Do We Write Quadratic Equations?”check-in materials include an assessment with questions based on a particular scenario. The expression 5.25 + 0.85x represents the amount a yogurt shop charges for yogurt with x ounces of toppings. The check-in materials effectively assess prior knowledge, allowing the teacher to refine instruction to meet student needs.
Evaluation for 2.1b
Materials include the definition and intended purpose for the types of instructional assessments included.
- Materials include definitions for the types of instructional assessments in Appendix: “Progress Monitoring; Analyzing and Responding to Data; How to Assess Progress.” For instance, materials state: "Each lesson includes a cool-down (analogous to an exit slip or exit ticket) to assess whether students understood the work of that day's lesson. Teachers may use this as a formative assessment to provide feedback or to plan further instruction."
- Materials include the intended purpose for the types of instructional assessments in the Appendix: “Course Design; Lesson Structure and Resources; Cool Down”. For example, materials state: “...task is to be given to students at the end of the primary learning activities or the end of the full lesson (after the Practice problems). The Cool Down serves as a brief formative assessment to determine whether students understood the lesson. Students’ responses to the Cool Down can be used to make adjustments to further instruction."
- The materials include information on the types of assessments and how to assess progress within the Appendix (Progress Monitoring). For instance, the "Unit Overview and Readiness" section clarifies these assessments as pre-unit diagnostic tools targeting prerequisite skills (Appendix:” Progress Monitoring”).
Evaluation for 2.1c
Materials include teacher guidance to ensure consistent and accurate administration of instructional assessments.
- The "Progress Monitoring" appendix provides detailed guidance on administering various assessments (exit tickets, practice problems, end-of-unit quizzes) with an emphasis on clear wording and targeted problems to ensure students understand their reasoning behind answers (correct and incorrect). (e.g., "...assessment problems are targeted...consistent wording...clear correct responses").
- The guidance emphasizes clear and consistent wording, targeted problems, and using student responses to accurately assess understanding (e.g., "...Students should get the correct answer on assessment problems for the right reasons, and get incorrect answers for the right reasons...").
- Materials include guidance (e.g., cool-down questions) for consistently using formative assessments to gauge student understanding and inform instruction (Appendix: Progress Monitoring: How to Assess). The "Progress Monitoring" appendix provides detailed guidance on administering various assessments (exit tickets, practice problems, end-of-unit quizzes) with an emphasis on clear wording and targeted problems to ensure students understand their reasoning behind answers (correct and incorrect). (e.g., "...assessment problems are targeted...consistent wording...clear correct responses").
Evaluation for 2.1d
Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments are aligned to the TEKS and objectives of the course, unit, or lesson.
- Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments comprehensively align with Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) and course, unit, and lesson objectives as seen in the “Appendix: Course Design”, and “Course Design: Unit Sequence and Resources”.
- The TEKS process standards are addressed throughout lessons and units, with a focus on real-world application in the culminating Unit Project (“Course Design: Unit Sequence and Resources”).
- Diagnostic assessments in the "Unit Overview and Readiness", formative (in-lesson activities), and summative ("cool down" activities, quizzes, projects) all demonstrate alignment with TEKS and objectives (e.g., Unit 2, Lesson 2.2 self-check).
- A TEKS blueprint outlines alignment for assessments in each unit ("Course Design: Assessment Types and Resources”).
Evaluation for 2.1e
Instructional assessments include standards-aligned items at varying levels of complexity.
- The materials include assessment diagnostics, formative, and summative assessments with items at varying levels of complexity. This includes knowledge-based multiple-choice, open-ended questions requiring students to show work, and higher-order thinking prompts (e.g., lesson 4.1.2). (Appendix: Course Design; Unit 1: Teacher Guide)
- Question complexity aligns with Costa's questioning levels (Gathering, Processing, Applying). (Appendix: Progress Monitoring)
- The materials provide examples across complexity levels, including Level 1 "Show Understanding" (e.g., Unit 9: Section A Quiz, Question 1) and Level 3 "Summarize" requiring synthesis (e.g., Project 8 Teacher Guide).
- While complexity variation is shown in formative and summative assessments, information regarding complexity within diagnostic assessments is limited.
2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring
Evaluation for 2.2a
Instructional assessments and scoring information provide guidance for interpreting and responding to student performance.
- Instructional assessments include detailed guidance for teachers on addressing below-grade skills within on-grade tasks, as outlined in the “Course Overview: Teacher Guide: Assessment”. Strategies such as adding related questions to warm-ups and activity launches help integrate skills in context, enhancing comprehension and application.
- Scoring rubrics are included in the "Course Overview: Teacher Guide Assessment." They clearly define evaluating student responses to restricted and extended response items. Rubrics categorize responses into tiers, providing specific feedback on completeness, conceptual understanding, and error types, aiding teachers in precise assessment and feedback.
- Instructional tasks are accompanied by expected responses and misconceptions, aiding teachers in adjusting instruction based on student interactions, as seen in the “Appendix: Progress Monitoring” which details both formative and summative assessment opportunities.
- At the beginning of each unit, there is an “Overview and Readiness” assessment, and various feedback mechanisms are integrated, such as "cool-downs" for immediate understanding checks, practice problems for in-class or homework assignments, and end-of-unit quizzes to assess cumulative knowledge, ensuring continuous support and adjustments in teaching strategies.
- The “Progress Monitoring” section in the Appendix includes guidance on interpreting student performance through analysis of common errors in multiple-choice questions and anticipated misconceptions, providing diagnostic insights to refine teaching approaches.
- Each unit anticipates likely student misconceptions, preparing teachers with appropriate responses, as exemplified in “Project 8 Teacher Guide”, which equips educators to correct misunderstandings related to mathematical functions effectively.
Evaluation for 2.2b
Materials provide guidance for the use of included tasks and activities to respond to student trends in performance on assessments.
- Each unit begins with a pre-unit diagnostic assessment titled "Unit Overview and Readiness" found in the Appendix: “Progress Monitoring”. These assessments consist of three questions focusing on prerequisite concepts and skills, allowing teachers to identify students with specific below-grade needs and adjust the pacing or focus of instruction based on the initial understanding of key upcoming unit ideas.
- The materials instruct teachers to integrate below-grade skills into on-grade tasks without abandoning the curriculum's scope. This guidance, detailed in the Appendix: “Progress Monitoring: Analyzing and Responding to Data”, encourages adapting tasks or adding practice opportunities in context to address persistent difficulties, ensuring continual engagement with the core content.
- The “Progress Monitoring” section provides strategies for responding to various student performance trends, detailing actions for when students perform well, underperform, or fail to grasp below-grade-level skills. This includes adjustments such as the integration of targeted skills in upcoming units and modifying tasks to reinforce specific concepts.
- Materials provide guidance for monitoring student responses to tasks and activities through tools like "cool-downs" to assess immediate comprehension. Feedback from these assessments informs instructional adjustments, as outlined in dropdown menus within the “Progress Monitoring” section, helping teachers address misconceptions or areas where students have not understood key concepts.
Evaluation for 2.2c
Materials include tools for students to track their own progress and growth.
- Materials include tools for students to track their progress using a variety of assessments listed in the “Course Design: Unit Sequence”, including Unit Projects, STAAR Reviews, Quizzes, and Unit Wrap-Ups, all featuring a self-assessment tool to evaluate mastery of learning targets.
- Each unit concludes with a "Wrap-Up" that includes a "Student Self-Assessment," enabling students to reflect on their skills and understanding. This feature is highlighted in the “Unit 5 Wrap-Up”, which guides students to assess their learning achievements upon completing the unit.
- Materials provide an interactive platform where students can continuously monitor their progress. Features like the “Self Check” and learning goal check-ins in lessons provide immediate feedback and direct students to additional resources if needed, fostering self-directed learning and growth assessment. For example, the "Unit 8 Student Self-Assessment" begins by asking students if they believe they can "Explain the meaning of a solution to an equation in terms of a situation.”.