Instructional Materials Review and Approval

Bluebonnet Learning RLA, Grade 4

ELAR Grade 4

SBOE Approved | IMRA 2024

Publisher: Texas Education Agency, Open Education Resources

Copyright: 2024

Series includes:

Quality Review

Standards Alignment

Rubric Section
Grade TEKS Student % TEKS Teacher % ELPS Student % ELPS Teacher %
Grade 4 100% 100% 100% 100%

Criteria for Quality

Rubric Section 1 Intentional Instructional Design Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional course, unit, and lesson-level design. Total TOTAL100% (53 out of 53 points) 100%
Section 1 Intentional Instructional Design Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional course, unit, and lesson-level design. Total 100% (53 out of 53 points)

1.1 Course-Level Design

1.1a
Materials include a scope and sequence outlining the TEKS, ELPS, concepts, and knowledge taught in the course.
5 out of 5 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1b
Materials include suggested pacing (pacing guide/calendar) to support effective implementation for various instructional calendars (e.g., varying numbers of instructional days – 165, 180, 210).
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1c
Materials include an explanation for the rationale of unit order as well as how concepts to be learned connect throughout the course.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1d
Materials include guidance, protocols, and/or templates for unit and lesson internalization.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1e
Materials include resources and guidance to support administrators and instructional coaches with implementing the materials as designed.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2 Unit-Level Design

1.2a
Materials include comprehensive unit overviews that provide the background content knowledge and academic vocabulary necessary to effectively teach the concepts in the unit.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2b
Materials contain supports for families in both Spanish and English for each unit with suggestions on supporting the progress of their student.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3 Lesson-Level Design

1.3a
Materials include comprehensive, structured, detailed lesson plans that include daily objectives, questions, tasks, materials, and instructional assessments required to meet the content and language standards of the lesson.
30 out of 30 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3b
Materials include a lesson overview outlining the suggested timing for each lesson component.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3c
Materials include a lesson overview listing the teacher and student materials necessary to effectively deliver the lesson.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3d
Materials include guidance on the effective use of lesson materials for extended practice (e.g., homework, extension, enrichment).
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 2 Progress Monitoring Materials support educators in effective implementation through frequent, strategic opportunities to monitor and respond to student progress. Total TOTAL100% (28 out of 28 points) 100%
Section 2 Progress Monitoring Materials support educators in effective implementation through frequent, strategic opportunities to monitor and respond to student progress. Total 100% (28 out of 28 points)

2.1 Instructional Assessments

2.1a
Materials include a variety of instructional assessments at the unit and lesson level (including diagnostic, formative, and summative) that vary in types of tasks and questions.
12 out of 12 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1b
Materials include the definition and intended purpose for the types of instructional assessments included.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1c
Materials include teacher guidance to ensure consistent and accurate administration of instructional assessments.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1d
Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments are aligned to the TEKS and objectives of the course, unit, or lesson.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1e
Instructional assessments include standards-aligned items at varying levels of complexity.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring

2.2a
Instructional assessments and scoring information provide guidance for interpreting and responding to student performance.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2b
Materials provide guidance for the use of included tasks and activities to respond to student trends in performance on assessments.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2c
Materials include tools for students to track their own progress and growth.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 3 Supports for All Learners Materials support educators in reaching all learners through design focused on engagement, representation, and action/expression for learner variability. Total TOTAL100% (32 out of 32 points) 100%
Section 3 Supports for All Learners Materials support educators in reaching all learners through design focused on engagement, representation, and action/expression for learner variability. Total 100% (32 out of 32 points)

3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds

3.1a
Materials include teacher guidance for differentiated instruction, activities, and/or paired (scaffolded) lessons for students who have not yet reached proficiency on grade-level content and skills.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1b
Materials include pre-teaching or embedded supports for unfamiliar vocabulary and references in text (e.g., figurative language, idioms, academic language).
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1c
Materials include teacher guidance for differentiated instruction, enrichment, and extension activities for students who have demonstrated proficiency in grade-level content and skills.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2 Instructional Methods

3.2a
Materials include prompts and guidance to support the teacher in modeling, explaining, and communicating the concept(s) to be learned explicitly (directly).
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2b
Materials include teacher guidance and recommendations for effective lesson delivery and facilitation using a variety of instructional approaches.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2c
Materials support multiple types of practice (e.g., guided, independent, collaborative) and include guidance for teachers and recommended structures (e.g., whole group, small group, individual) to support effective implementation.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students

3.3a
Materials include teacher guidance on providing linguistic accommodations for various levels of language proficiency [as defined by the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)], which are designed to engage students in using increasingly more academic language.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3b
Materials include implementation guidance to support teachers in effectively using the materials in state-approved bilingual/ESL programs.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3c
Materials include embedded guidance for teachers to support emergent bilingual students in developing academic vocabulary, increasing comprehension, building background knowledge, and making cross-linguistic connections through oral and written discourse.
8 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3d
If designed for dual language immersion (DLI) programs, materials include resources that outline opportunities to address metalinguistic transfer from English to the partner language.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 4 Foundational Skills Materials include guidance for explicit (direct) and systematic instruction in foundational skills, instructional routines, student practice, and cumulative review. Total TOTAL97% (106 out of 109 points) 97%
Section 4 Foundational Skills Materials include guidance for explicit (direct) and systematic instruction in foundational skills, instructional routines, student practice, and cumulative review. Total 97% (106 out of 109 points)

4.A.1 Oral Language Oral Language Development

4.A.1a
Materials include guidance for the teacher to support students in expressing an opinion and organizing presentations for specific purposes and audiences according to grade level TEKS.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.A.1b
Materials include guidance and opportunities for students to follow, restate and give oral instructions as directed by the grade-level English language arts TEKS.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.A.1c
Materials include authentic opportunities for students to listen actively, ask questions, engage in discussion to understand information, and share information and ideas.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.1 Phonics (Encoding/Decoding) Sound-Spelling Patterns (grades 4–5 only)

4.B.1a (grades 4–5 only)
Materials include a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, as outlined in the TEKS.
0 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.1b (grades 4–5 only)
Materials include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction for grade-level sound-spelling patterns.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.1c (grades 4–5 only)
Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce grade-level sound-spelling patterns (through cumulative review).
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.2 Phonics (Encoding/Decoding) Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words

4.B.2a
Materials include a systematic sequence for introducing regular and irregular high-frequency words. (PR 2.A.1)
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.2b
Materials include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction for decoding and encoding regular and irregular high-frequency words.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.2c
Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce skills to decode and encode regular and irregular high-frequency words (through cumulative review).
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.2d
Materials include a variety of activities and resources (including the use of memory building strategies) for students to recognize, read, and write high-frequency words in isolation (e.g., word lists) and in connected text (e.g., within sentences).
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.3 Phonics (Encoding/Decoding) Decoding and Encoding Multisyllabic Words

4.B.3a
Materials include a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level syllable types and syllable division principles, as outlined in the TEKS.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.3b
Materials include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction for applying knowledge of syllable types and syllable division principles to decode and encode multisyllabic words.
8 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.3c
Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice and reinforce skills to decode and encode multisyllabic words (through cumulative review).
12 out of 12 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.3d
Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to practice decoding and encoding multisyllabic words, using knowledge of syllable types and syllable division principles, in isolation (e.g., word lists) and in connected text that builds on previous instruction.
16 out of 16 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.4 Phonics (Encoding/Decoding) Morphological Awareness

4.B.4a
Materials include a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level morphemes, as outlined in the TEKS. (PR 2.A.1)
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.4b
Materials include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction for supporting recognition of common morphemes and using their meanings (e.g., affixes, roots, and base words) to support decoding, encoding, and reading comprehension. (PR 2.A.1)
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.4c
Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce grade-level morphological skills (through cumulative review). (PR 2.A.1 & 2.A.3)
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.B.4d
Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to decode and encode words with morphemes in isolation (e.g., word lists) and in connected text that builds on previous instruction (e.g., within sentences). (PR 2.A.1 & 2.A.3)
8 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.C.1 Vocabulary Support Vocabulary Development

4.C.1a
Materials include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction on the purpose and use of both print and digital resources such as dictionaries, glossaries, eBooks, and online dictionaries.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.C.1b
Materials include print and digital resources to support students in determining the meaning, syllabication, pronunciation, word origin and part of speech of vocabulary.
10 out of 10 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.C.1c
Materials support students in using context to determine the meaning of unfamiliar words according to grade level TEKS.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.D.1 Fluency Reading Fluency

4.D.1a
Materials include a variety of grade-level texts to support students to read fluently according to the reading purpose.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.D.1b
Materials include practice activities and tasks to develop word reading fluency in a variety of settings (e.g., independently, in partners, in teacher-facilitated small groups, etc.).
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.D.1c
Materials include materials and tools for teachers, with strategies to support students through self-sustained reading with high-quality grade-level texts.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.D.1d
Materials include texts at different levels of complexity for the building of accuracy, fluency, prosody, and comprehension.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.E.1 Handwriting Handwriting Development

4.E.1a
Materials include explicit (direct) instruction on the teaching of handwriting skills appropriate for each grade level and, when possible, connected to current student learning.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.E.1b
Materials include frequent opportunities, resources, activities, and tasks for students to authentically practice and develop handwriting skills appropriate for each grade level.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 5 Knowledge Coherence Materials support the development of connected background knowledge and key academic vocabulary within and across grade levels. Total TOTAL100% (52 out of 52 points) 100%
Section 5 Knowledge Coherence Materials support the development of connected background knowledge and key academic vocabulary within and across grade levels. Total 100% (52 out of 52 points)

5.A.1 Connected Knowledge Topics Connected Knowledge-Building Units and Lessons

5.A.1a
Units are designed to build knowledge based in the fields of science, history, literature, and the arts.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.1b
Materials provide a scope and sequence to demonstrate the approach to knowledge-building within and across grade levels.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.1c
Units are designed for students to spend extended time (e.g., 3 weeks or more) on connected knowledge-building topics and texts.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.1d
Lessons are connected by anchoring texts or text sets designed to intentionally build connected student background knowledge over time.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.1e
Grammar, vocabulary, discussion, and writing activities are connected to the knowledge-building topic of the lesson.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.2 Connected Knowledge Topics Context and Student Background Knowledge

5.A.2a
Materials activate or supply background knowledge by making connections to previously learned content from prior grade levels.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.2b
Materials activate or supply background knowledge by making connections across units within a grade level.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.2c
Materials provide students with relevant and targeted context or background knowledge to enhance the student's engagement with the text.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.3 Connected Knowledge Topics Developing Student Comprehension with Connected Topics, Questions, and Tasks

5.A.3a
Questions and tasks require students to engage with big ideas, topics, and themes.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.3b
Questions and tasks prompt students to synthesize knowledge and concepts across texts within and across lessons and units.
16 out of 16 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.3c
Culminating tasks require students to demonstrate their knowledge of the unit topic by making connections across related texts.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.3d
Materials provide opportunities to apply new understanding based on the topic to contexts beyond the classroom.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.4 Connected Knowledge Topics Key Academic Vocabulary and Grade-Level Concepts

5.A.4a
Materials include a year-long scope and sequence for building tier 2 and 3 academic vocabulary in the context of knowledge-building.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.4b
Materials include practice and application opportunities with appropriate content and language scaffolds and supports for teachers to differentiate vocabulary development for all learners.
8 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.4c
Materials include tasks designed to engage students in purposeful use of key academic vocabulary.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.A.4d
Materials include nonverbal teaching techniques to support students in the acquisition of key academic vocabulary, such as the use of images and visualization.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.B.1 Inquiry and Research Recursive Inquiry Process

5.B.1a
Materials include opportunities for students to engage in critical inquiry as part of the research process, such as generating questions, developing a plan identifying, and gathering relevant information from a variety of sources, and synthesizing the information.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.B.1b
Materials include guidance and opportunities for students to differentiate between primary and secondary sources.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.B.1c
Materials include opportunities for students to learn to differentiate between paraphrasing and plagiarism.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.B.1d (grades 6–8 only)
Materials include a progression of focused research tasks to encourage students to develop knowledge in a given area by confronting or analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials. (6-8)
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 6 Text Quality and Complexity Materials ensure students spend a majority of their time interacting with increasingly complex grade-level text. Total TOTAL97% (33 out of 34 points) 97%
Section 6 Text Quality and Complexity Materials ensure students spend a majority of their time interacting with increasingly complex grade-level text. Total 97% (33 out of 34 points)

6.1 High-Quality Grade-Level Texts

6.1a
Materials reflect the inclusion of text types and genres required by the grade-level TEKS.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1b
Core texts used for instruction are written at grade level when evaluated using research-based measures of text complexity.
0 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1c
Texts are well-crafted and are of publishable quality.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1d
Materials include traditional, contemporary, classical, and diverse texts across multiple content areas.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1e
Texts include content that is relevant, engaging, and authentically reflects students’ backgrounds and experiences.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2 Interaction with Grade-Level Text

6.2a
Materials include opportunities in each lesson for students to interact with grade-level text.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2b
Materials include opportunities in each lesson for students to listen to, think about, and critically respond to grade-level texts and justify their thinking orally and in writing.
5 out of 5 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2c
Materials include opportunities in each lesson to discuss specific aspects of grade-level text (e.g., authors’ purpose, structure, language, vocabulary, etc.).
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2d
Materials include opportunities in each lesson for students to engage in a variety of reading skills with grade-level text (e.g., generating questions at various levels of complexity, making, and confirming predictions, inferencing, analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing).
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.3 Supporting Access to Grade-Level Text

6.3a
Materials include teacher guidance and supports to ensure all students can access grade-level text while maintaining rigor through the use of embedded scaffolds (e.g., vocabulary support, questioning, think-alouds, sentence frames.).
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.3b
Materials provide opportunities for students who demonstrate proficiency to engage in additional analysis of grade-level texts.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.4 Analysis of Text Complexity

6.4a
Materials include quantitative and qualitative analysis of each core text, including a rationale for each text’s educational purpose and grade-level placement.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.4b
Core texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to their quantitative and qualitative analysis and relationship to student tasks.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.5 Self-Sustained Independent Reading

6.5a
Materials include explicit (direct) guidance for teachers on how to monitor students’ comprehension and hold them accountable during independent reading.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.5b
Texts designated for independent reading have a range of complexity levels for students to practice reading independently.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.5c
Materials include a plan for students to self-select high quality texts and read independently for a sustained period, including planning and accountability for achieving independent reading goals.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 7 Evidence-Based Tasks and Responses Materials require students to engage in reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence using literary and informational text. Total TOTAL100% (74 out of 74 points) 100%
Section 7 Evidence-Based Tasks and Responses Materials require students to engage in reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence using literary and informational text. Total 100% (74 out of 74 points)

7.A.1 Text-Dependent Tasks Use of Text Evidence

7.A.1a
Materials include text-dependent questions and tasks which require students to use evidence from the text to demonstrate comprehension, justify their thinking, and support claims.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.A.1b
Questions and tasks require students to use text evidence when evaluating the language, key ideas, details, craft, and structure of high-quality texts.
10 out of 10 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.A.1c
Questions and tasks require students to support their claims and justify their thinking through a variety of strategies, such as comparing sources, paraphrasing, summarizing, and discussing key ideas in evidence from the text.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.A.1d
Questions and tasks are designed at different levels of cognitive complexity to provide ample opportunities for students to engage in the analysis of text.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.A.2 Text-Dependent Tasks Teacher Guidance for the Use of Text Evidence

7.A.2a
Materials include guidance for teachers on the effective modeling of the use of text evidence to generate evidence-based claims and construct text-based responses.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.A.2b
Materials include guidance for teachers on the use of structured opportunities to engage students in evidence-based discussions using academic vocabulary and syntax.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.1 Writing Genre Characteristics and Craft to Compose Multiple Texts

7.B.1a
Materials include mentor texts that serve as models for students to compose a variety of texts according to grade-level TEKS.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.1b
Materials include opportunities for students to compose literary texts for multiple purposes and audiences with genre-specific characteristics and craft.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.1c
Materials include opportunities for students to compose informational texts for multiple purposes and audiences with genre-specific characteristics and craft.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.1d
Materials include opportunities for students to compose argumentative texts for multiple purposes and audiences with genre-specific characteristics and craft.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.1e
Materials include opportunities for students to compose correspondence with genre-specific characteristics and craft.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.2 Writing Writing Process

7.B.2a
Materials support students’ use of the elements of the writing process (planning, drafting, revising, conferring, editing, and sharing/publishing) to compose text, which includes an age-appropriate progression in the conventions of writing.
5 out of 5 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.2b
Materials include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction to model each element of the writing process (planning, drafting, revising, editing, and sharing/publishing) and to support students during the writing process through conferencing and revising.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.3 Writing Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Writing Instruction

7.B.3a
Materials include guidance for teachers to provide explicit (direct) instruction on sentence-level writing, focusing on structure, syntax, and vocabulary.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.3b
Materials include guidance for teachers to provide systematic and explicit (direct) instruction in writing starting at the sentence level and building to compositions according to grade-level TEKS.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.3c
Materials include systematic and explicit (direct) opportunities for students to engage in increasingly complex sentence-level writing, revising, and editing.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.4 Writing Grade-Level Standard English Conventions

7.B.4a
Materials include opportunities for practice and application both in and out of context of the conventions of academic language (e.g., the use of simple and compound sentences with subject-verb agreement, the appropriate use of different verb tenses, nouns, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, pronouns, and coordinating conjunctions) according to the grade-level TEKS.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.4b
Materials include opportunities for students to write grammatically correct sentences and short paragraphs using correct capitalization and punctuation according to the grade-level TEKS.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

7.B.4c
Materials include systematic opportunities for practice of and application of grammar, punctuation, and usage, both in and out of context.
12 out of 12 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Program Information

Copyright Type
Creative Commons
Print Version
Estimated number of pages:
Digital Version
Estimated number of click or scroll pages:
back to top