Overview
Grade K Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 52 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 22 / 28 |
- Support for All Learners
| 31 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 20 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 134 / 158 |
Strengths
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials adhere to TEKS, ELPS, concepts, and knowledge taught. They apply appropriate pacing while providing explanations for concepts, guiding for lesson internalization, and including resources to support administrators.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Material support educators in effective implementation through intentional lesson-level design.
- 2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to interpret track their growth.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials provide educators with guidance to pre-teach unfamiliar vocabulary and references and implement differentiated instruction.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials guide educators in effectively modeling, delivering, and facilitating lessons through explicit instructional approaches and varied practice opportunities.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 5.C.1 Alphabet Knowledge: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing letter names and sounds, with explicit instruction for letter identification and formation. They include activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce alphabet knowledge both in isolation and within meaningful print.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, offering explicit instructional guidance and diverse activities for students to develop, practice, and reinforce these patterns in both isolated words and decodable connected text.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular and irregular high-frequency words, with varied activities for decoding, encoding, and practicing these words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce skills to decode and encode one-syllable or multisyllabic words (through cumulative review).
Challenges
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive unit overview, provide content knowledge and academic vocabulary for effective teaching of unit concepts.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials do not include teacher guidance to ensure accurate administration of instructional assessments, are not aligned to TEKS, and do not include standards-aligned items at varying levels of complexity.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not provide educators with guidance on linguistic accommodations for various levels of language proficiency.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Materials do not ensure daily lessons provide explicit instruction with teacher modeling, guided practice with immediate feedback, or diverse opportunities for collaborative and independent student practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials do not provide a variety of developmentally appropriate assessment tools with clear administration guidelines, systematic progress monitoring, or year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not offer data-management tools for tracking individual and whole-class progress.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not provide explicit and systematic guidance for developing oral language through diverse methods, with opportunities for social and academic communication, active listening, discussion, or idea-sharing for various purposes and audiences.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not include guidance for the teacher to provide explicit (direct) instruction focused on connecting phonemes to letters within words with recommended explanatory feedback for students based on common misconceptions.
- 5.D.1 Phonological Awareness: Materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonological awareness.
- 5.D.2 Phonemic Awareness: Materials do not follow a systematic sequence for phonemic awareness, progressing from basic to complex skills, with explicit instruction and feedback or provide varied activities for cumulative practice and reinforcement (through cumulative review).
Summary
Bridge to Reading is a foundational literacy skills program for learners in grades K–3. In grade K, the program offers a comprehensive and structured approach to phonemic awareness and phonics instruction that includes a supportive lesson framework promoting early literacy development. The curriculum is organized into 35 weeks of direct and explicit instruction, each comprising five lessons, resulting in a total of 175 lessons. The grade-level appropriate lessons utilize a gradual release of responsibility model that includes warm-up activities, direct instruction with modeling, practice resources, and lesson wrap-ups and extensions.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- Grade K materials focus on the introduction of letters, sounds, and basic phonemic awareness. Most lessons are sequenced and systematically structured, ensuring students master basic skills first before introducing more complex concepts. The lessons include ample opportunities to practice previously taught skills while adapting to new ones.
- Additionally, the materials include extensive teacher guidance with scripted lessons and suggested pacing. However, some lessons are not aligned with the TEKS and may require teacher discretion for best use. The curriculum offers differentiated instruction opportunities for various learners, including multilingual, advanced, and struggling learners; nevertheless, that content is limited and not easily accessible within the materials.
Grade 1 Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 52 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 22 / 28 |
- Support for All Learners
| 31 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 20 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 140 / 164 |
Strengths
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials adhere to TEKS, ELPS, concepts, and knowledge taught. They apply appropriate pacing while providing explanations for concepts, guiding for lesson internalization, and including resources to support administrators.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Material support educators in effective implementation through intentional lesson-level design.
- 2.2 Data analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to interpret track their growth.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials provide educators with guidance to pre-teach unfamiliar vocabulary and references and implement differentiated instruction.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials guide educators in effectively modeling, delivering, and facilitating lessons through explicit instructional approaches and varied practice opportunities.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, offering explicit instructional guidance and diverse activities for students to develop, practice, and reinforce these patterns in both isolated words and decodable connected text.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular and irregular high-frequency words, with varied activities for decoding, encoding, and practicing these words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials systematically introduce syllable types and division principles, with explicit instruction and varied activities for decoding and encoding one-syllable and multisyllabic words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.4 Morphological Awareness: Materials systematically introduce grade-level morphemes, with explicit instruction and varied activities for recognizing, decoding, encoding, and comprehending words with morphemes in both isolation and connected text.
Challenges
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials lack comprehensive unit overviews that provide the academic vocabulary necessary to effectively teach the concepts in the unit.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials lack teacher guidance for accurate assessment administration. Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments are not aligned to the TEKS. Instructional assessment items are not standards-aligned.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials provide teacher guidance for linguistic accommodations at the beginning level but not various language proficiency levels, as defined by the ELPS.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Daily lessons lack opportunities for immediate corrective feedback and a variety of opportunities for collaborative or independent practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials do not provide consistent directions for administration of assessments, a variety of developmentally appropriate assessment tools, systematic progress monitoring, year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not offer data-management tools for tracking individual and whole-class progress. Materials do not include guidance on the frequency of progress monitoring or how to accelerate learning based on the progress monitoring.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials lack explicit, systematic guidance for developing oral language and oracy through methods like modeling, guided practice, and feedback. They also do not provide opportunities for social communication, asking questions, or sharing ideas for different purposes and audiences.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not include guidance for explicit instruction focused on connecting phonemes to letters within words with recommended explanatory feedback for students based on common misconceptions.
- 5.D.1 Phonological Awareness: Materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonological awareness.
- 5.D.2 Phonemic Awareness: The materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonemic awareness and a variety of resources for skill development, practice, and reinforcement.
Summary
The Bridge to Reading curriculum by Heggerty is a foundational literacy skills program for learners in grades K–3. In grade 1, the program provides a structured approach to further develop early literacy skills attained in grade K while accommodating the diverse needs of all students. The curriculum is organized into 35 weeks of direct and explicit instruction, each comprising five lessons, resulting in a total of 175 lessons. The grade-level appropriate lessons utilize a gradual release of responsibility model that includes warm-up activities, direct instruction with modeling, practice resources, and lesson wrap-ups and extensions.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- The first few weeks of grade 1 materials review and build upon the phonics skills developed in grade K and then advance into a focus on decoding and encoding multisyllabic words and recognizing common spelling patterns. Grade 1 lessons also introduce opportunities for students to write simple sentences and read short stories independently.
- Additionally, the materials include extensive teacher guidance with scripted lessons and suggested pacing. Some assessments and assessment items are not fully TEKS- and standards-aligned and therefore may require discretion for best use. The curriculum offers differentiated instruction opportunities for various learners, including multilingual, advanced, and struggling learners.
Grade 2 Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 52 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 22 / 28 |
- Support for All Learners
| 31 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 20 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 160 / 191 |
Strengths
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials adhere to TEKS, ELPS, concepts, and knowledge taught. They apply appropriate pacing while providing explanations for concepts, guiding for lesson internalization, and including resources to support administrators.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Material support educators in effective implementation through intentional lesson-level design.
- 2.2 Data analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to interpret track their growth.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials provide educators with guidance to pre-teach unfamiliar vocabulary and references and implement differentiated instruction.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials guide educators in effectively modeling, delivering, and facilitating lessons through explicit instructional approaches and varied practice opportunities.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, offering explicit instructional guidance and diverse activities for students to develop, practice, and reinforce these patterns in both isolated words and decodable connected text.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular and irregular high-frequency words, with varied activities for decoding, encoding, and practicing these words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials systematically introduce syllable types and division principles, with explicit instruction and varied activities for decoding and encoding one-syllable and multisyllabic words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.4 Morphological Awareness: Materials systematically introduce grade-level morphemes, with explicit instruction and varied activities for recognizing, decoding, encoding, and comprehending words with morphemes in both isolation and connected text.
Challenges
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive unit overviews that provide the academic vocabulary necessary to effectively teach the concepts in the unit.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials do not include appropriate and defined instructional assessments aligned to TEKS at varying levels of complexity, or offer guidance to educators on consistent administration of assessments.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not provide educators with guidance on linguistic accommodations for various levels of proficiency.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Materials do not ensure daily lessons provide guided practice with immediate feedback or diverse opportunities for collaborative student practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials do not provide developmentally appropriate assessment tools with clear administration guidelines, systematic progress monitoring, or year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not offer data-management tools for tracking individual and whole-class progress, guidance on the frequency of progress monitoring, or guidance on how to accelerate learning.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not provide explicit and systematic guidance for developing oral language through diverse methods, with opportunities for social and academic communication for various audiences, or authentic opportunities for students to ask questions.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not include guidance for explanatory feedback.
- 5.D.1 Phonological Awareness: Materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonological awareness, recommended explanatory feedback, or a variety of activities and resources for phonological awareness.
- 5.D.2 Phonemic Awareness: Materials do not follow a systematic sequence for phonemic awareness, progressing from basic to complex skills that begin with identifying and segmenting phonemes, or a variety of resources for phonemic awareness.
Summary
"Bridge to Reading" is a foundational literacy skills program for learners in grades K–3. In grade 2, the program is designed to build upon the literacy skills developed in earlier grades with a focus on advancing reading fluency, comprehension, vocabulary, and writing abilities. The materials are organized into 35 weeks of direct and explicit instruction, each comprising five lessons, resulting in a total of 175 lessons. The grade-level appropriate lessons utilize a gradual release of responsibility model that includes warm-up activities, direct instruction with modeling, practice resources, and lesson wrap-ups and extensions.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- As the students transfer from learning to read to reading to learn, the focus of grade 2 materials shifts to understanding and interpreting texts more deeply frequently using student workbooks and paired text.
- While the materials in grade 2 include lesson scripts for teachers to ask students clarifying questions, there aren’t many options within the lesson framework for students to ask questions or take ownership of their learning. Teachers will have to embed opportunities and use additional resources to increase student-directed questioning and collaborative learning.
Grade 3 Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 49 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 22 / 28 |
- Support for All Learners
| 31 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 21 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 110 / 166 |
Strengths
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials adhere to TEKS, ELPS, concepts, and knowledge taught. They apply appropriate pacing while providing explanations for concepts, guiding for lesson internalization, and including resources to support administrators.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional lesson-level design.
- 2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to interpret and track their progress and growth.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials provide educators with guidance to pre-teach unfamiliar vocabulary and references and implement differentiated instruction.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials guide educators in effectively modeling, delivering, and facilitating lessons through explicit instructional approaches and varied practice opportunities.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, offering explicit instructional guidance and diverse activities for students to develop, practice, and reinforce these patterns in both isolated words and decodable connected text.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials systematically introduce syllable types and division principles, with explicit instruction and varied activities for decoding and encoding one-syllable and multisyllabic words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.4 Morphological Awareness: Materials systematically introduce grade-level morphemes, with explicit instruction and varied activities for recognizing, decoding, encoding, and comprehending words with morphemes in both isolation and connected text.
Challenges
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive unit overviews that include essential background content and academic vocabulary. They also do not provide bilingual supports for families in Spanish and English, including suggestions for helping their students.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials do not include teacher guidance for accurately administering instructional assessments. Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments do not align with TEKS, and assessment items do not include standards-aligned content.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not include guidance for various levels of language proficiency.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Daily lessons lack immediate corrective feedback and do not offer diverse opportunities for collaborative or independent practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials do not provide a variety of developmentally appropriate assessment tools, systematic progress monitoring, or year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not track individual and whole-class student progress, guidance on progress monitoring frequency, and strategies for accelerating learning based on progress data.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not include systematic guidance on developing oral language, opportunities for social communication, and authentic chances for students to ask questions and share ideas.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not guidance for teachers on explicitly connecting phonemes to letters with recommended feedback for common misconceptions.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials lack a systematic sequence for high-frequency words, explicit instruction for decoding and encoding them, and activities for developing, practicing, and reinforcing these skills.
Summary
Bridge to Reading is a foundational literacy skills program for learners in grades K–3. In grade 3, the program includes various components to enhance a student's reading and comprehension ability. The curriculum is organized into 24 weeks of direct and explicit instruction. The grade-level appropriate lessons utilize a gradual release of responsibility model that includes warm-up activities, direct instruction with modeling, practice resources, and lesson wrap-ups and extensions.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- Teachers might find it challenging to implement the materials as intended due to the absence of comprehensive unit overviews. Instructional leaders may need to provide teachers with the essential background content knowledge and academic vocabulary required for effective unit planning and implementation.
- Although the grade 3 materials provide lesson scripts for teachers to ask clarifying questions, the lesson framework offers limited opportunities for students to ask questions or take ownership of their learning. Teachers may need to incorporate additional strategies and resources to enhance student engagement.