Overview
Grade K Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 18 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 16 / 28 |
- Supports for All Learners
| 10 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 31 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 107 / 158 |
Strengths
- 2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to interpret track their progress and growth.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials provide developmentally appropriate assessment tools with clear administration guidelines, systematic progress monitoring, and year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, offering explicit instructional guidance and diverse activities for students to develop, practice, and reinforce these patterns in both isolated words and decodable connected text.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials include a variety of activities and resources for students to develop, practice, and reinforce skills to decode and encode one-syllable or multisyllabic words (through cumulative review).
Challenges
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials do not outline the TEKS, ELPS, and knowledge taught. They do include suggested pacing, a rationale for unit order, or supports for unit internalization.
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive unit overview, provide content knowledge and academic vocabulary for effective teaching, or suggestions to support families in their students’ success.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive, detailed lesson plans to meet language standards or lesson overviews listing necessary materials for lesson delivery.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials do not include a variety of unit-level assessments that vary in types of tasks and questions, and are not aligned to TEKS and objectives.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials do not provide educators with guidance for differentiation or embedded supports for vocabulary.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials do not include recommendations for effective lesson delivery using a variety of instructional approaches or provide multiple types of student practice.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not provide educators with guidance on linguistic accommodations, bilingual/ESL program implementation, or support for emergent bilingual students.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Daily lessons lack opportunities for feedback and collaborative learning.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not guidance on determining frequency of progress monitoring or accelerating learning based on student data.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not provide explicit and systematic guidance for developing oral language through diverse methods.
- 5.C.1 Alphabet Knowledge: Materials do not provide guidance for explicit instruction in uppercase letters.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not provide teacher guidance for connecting phonemes to letters in words with explanatory feedback.
- 5.D.1 Phonological Awareness: Materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonological awareness, starting with simple skills and progressing to complex ones, offering explicit instruction with corrective feedback and diverse activities for practice or reinforcement aligned to grade-level TEKS.
- 5.D.2 Phonemic Awareness: Materials do not follow a systematic sequence for phonemic awareness, progressing from basic to complex skills, with explicit instruction and feedback, connecting phonemic awareness to the alphabetic principle.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials do not systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular high-frequency words.
Summary
Institute for Multi-Sensory Education (IMSE) Comprehensive Orton-Gillingham Plus is an English phonics K–3 program. The program offers explicit and systematic instruction in phonics. It includes activities and resources to support the development of students’ phonological awareness, phonics, high-frequency word, decoding, and encoding skills. It also provides teacher guidance through scripted lessons and simple and repetitive routines and procedures for teachers to follow in every lesson. The program includes opportunities for students to develop phonics skills in isolation and in context with aligned decodable readers for each concept. Additionally, the program provides an intervention resource titled, Interventions For All: Phonological Awareness, with engaging activities and games for teachers to use to help build automaticity in students’ phonological awareness skills.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- The product provides an approach to phonics instruction that moves from simple to more complex and includes cumulative review of previous taught skills and practice throughout each lesson. However, the product does not specifically align to the TEKS for each individual grade level or provide opportunities for students to collaborate.
- While the product provides explicit teacher guidance and supports, including scripted lessons, simple daily routines, and data-tracking and assessment tools, it does not provide guidance on progress monitoring students based on their strengths and weaknesses or guidance on how to accelerate learning after mastery of concepts.
Grade 1 Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 18 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 16 / 28 |
- Supports for All Learners
| 10 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 31 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 113 / 164 |
Strengths
- 2.2 Data analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to interpret track their growth.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials provide developmentally appropriate assessment tools with clear administration guidelines, systematic progress monitoring, and year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: Materials provide a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level sound-spelling patterns, offering explicit instructional guidance and diverse activities for students to develop, practice, and reinforce these patterns in both isolated words and decodable connected text.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials systematically introduce syllable types and division principles, with explicit instruction and varied activities for decoding and encoding one-syllable and multisyllabic words in both isolation and connected text.
Challenges
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials do not outline the TEKS, ELPS, and knowledge taught. Materials lack pacing guidance for various calendars,, a rationale for unit order, and supports for unit internalization.
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive unit overview, provide content knowledge and academic vocabular for effective teaching, or suggestions to support families in their students’ success.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive, detailed lesson plans to meet language standards or lesson overviews listing necessary materials for lesson delivery.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials lack a variety of unit-level assessments aligned to standards and objectives.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials do not provide educators with guidance for differentiation or embedded supports for vocabulary.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials do not provide multiple types of student practice or teacher guidance on recommended structures.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not provide educators with guidance on linguistic accommodations, bilingual/ESL program implementation, or support for emergent bilingual students.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Daily lessons lack opportunities for feedback and collaborative learning.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials lack guidance on determining frequency of progress monitoring or accelerating learning based on student data.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not provide explicit and systematic guidance for developing oral language through diverse methods.
- 5.C.1 Alphabet Knowledge: Materials do not provide guidance for explicit instruction in uppercase letters.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not provide teacher guidance for connecting phonemes to letters in words with explanatory feedback.
- 5.D.1 Phonological Awareness: Materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonological awareness, starting with simple skills and progressing to complex ones, offering explicit instruction with corrective feedback and diverse activities for practice or reinforcement aligned to grade-level TEKS.
- 5.D.2 Phonemic Awareness: Materials do not follow a systematic sequence for phonemic awareness, progressing from basic to complex skills, with explicit instruction and feedback, connecting phonemic awareness to the alphabetic principle.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials do not systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular high-frequency words.
Summary
Institute for Multi-Sensory Education (IMSE) is an English phonics K–3 program. The program offers explicit and systematic instruction in phonics. It includes activities and resources to support the development of students’ phonological awareness, phonics, high-frequency word, decoding, and encoding skills. It also provides teacher guidance through scripted lessons and simple and repetitive routines and procedures for teachers to follow in every lesson. The program includes opportunities for students to develop phonics skills in isolation and in context with aligned decodable readers for each concept. Additionally, the program provides an intervention resource titled, Interventions For All: Phonological Awareness, with engaging activities and games for teachers to use to help build automaticity in students’ phonological awareness skills.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- The product provides an approach to phonics instruction that moves from simple to more complex and includes cumulative review of previous taught skills and practice throughout each lesson. It also provides explicit teacher guidance and supports, including scripted lessons, simple daily routines, and data-tracking and assessment tools.
- The product does not provide guidance on progress monitoring students based on their strengths and weaknesses or guidance on how to accelerate learning after mastery of concepts.
Grade 2 Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 18 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 16 / 28 |
- Supports for All Learners
| 10 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 31 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 123 / 191 |
Strengths
- 2.2 Data analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials include guidance to interpret student performance and tools for students to their progress and growth.
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials provide developmentally appropriate assessment tools with clear administration guidelines, systematic progress monitoring, and year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials systematically introduce syllable types and division principles, with explicit instruction and varied activities for decoding and encoding one-syllable and multisyllabic words in both isolation and connected text.
Challenges
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials do not outline the TEKS, ELPS, and knowledge taught. They do not include suggested pacing, a rationale for unit order, or supports for unit internalization.
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include a comprehensive unit overview, provide content knowledge and academic vocabulary for effective teaching, or include suggestions to support families in their students’ success for each unit.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive, detailed lesson plans to meet language standards or lesson overviews listing necessary materials for lesson delivery.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials lack a variety of unit-level assessments aligned to standards and objectives.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials do not provide educators with guidance for differentiation or embedded supports for vocabulary.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials do not provide multiple types of student practice or teacher guidance on recommended structures.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not provide educators with guidance on linguistic accommodations, bilingual/ESL program implementation, or support for emergent bilingual students.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Daily lessons lack opportunities for feedback and collaborative learning.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not provide guidance on determining the frequency of progress monitoring based on student strengths or accelerating learning based on student data.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not provide explicit and systematic guidance for developing oral language through diverse methods.
- 5.C.1 Alphabet Knowledge: Materials do not provide guidance for explicit instruction in uppercase letters.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not provide teacher guidance for connecting phonemes to letters in words with explanatory feedback.
- 5.D.1 Phonological Awareness: Materials do not provide a systematic sequence for introducing phonological awareness, starting with simple skills and progressing to complex ones, offering explicit instruction with corrective feedback and diverse activities for practice or reinforcement aligned to grade-level TEKS.
- 5.D.2 Phonemic Awareness: Materials do not follow a systematic sequence for phonemic awareness, progressing from basic to complex skills, with explicit instruction and feedback, connecting phonemic awareness to the alphabetic principle.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials do not systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular high-frequency words.
- 5.E.4 Morphological Awareness: The materials do not include a systematic sequence for introducing grade-level morphemes as outlined in the TEKS nor does it provide a variety of activities to develop, practice, or reinforce encoding and decoding skills.
Summary
IMSE Comprehensive Orton-Gillingham Plus is an English phonics K–3 program. The program offers explicit and systematic instruction in phonics. It provides teacher guidance through scripted lessons and simple and repetitive routines and procedures for teachers to follow in every lesson. The program includes opportunities for students to develop phonics skills in isolation and in context with aligned decodable readers for each concept. Additionally, the program provides an intervention resource titled, Interventions For All: Phonological Awareness, with engaging activities and games for teachers to use to help build automaticity in students’ phonological awareness skills.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- The product provides an approach to phonics instruction that moves from simple to more complex and includes a cumulative review of previously taught skills and practice throughout each lesson. However, the scope and sequence does not specifically align with the TEKS for each individual grade level, and the materials rarely provide opportunities for students to collaborate.
- While the product provides explicit teacher guidance and support, including scripted lessons, simple daily routines, and data-tracking and assessment tools, it does not provide guidance on progress monitoring students based on their strengths and weaknesses or how to accelerate learning after mastery of concepts.
Grade 3 Quality Review Summary
Rubric Section | Quality Rating |
- Intentional Instructional Design
| 18 / 53 |
- Progress Monitoring
| 15 / 28 |
- Supports for All Learners
| 10 / 32 |
- Phonics Rule Compliance
| 30 / 36 |
- Foundational Skills
| 109 / 166 |
Strengths
- 4.1 Explicit (Direct) and Systematic Phonics Instruction: Materials offer systematic and sequenced instruction in phonics and foundational skills, with explicit daily opportunities for practice, including isolated exercises, decodable texts, and cumulative review.
- 4.3 Ongoing Practice Opportunities: Materials incorporate intentional cumulative review and practice of explicitly taught phonics skills, using decodable texts and providing opportunities for isolated and connected practice.
- 4.4 Assessment: Materials provide developmentally appropriate assessment tools with clear administration guidelines, systematic progress monitoring, and year-long assessment opportunities aligned to grade-level phonics skills.
- 5.E.3 Decoding and Encoding One-Syllable or Multisyllabic Words: Materials systematically introduce syllable types and division principles, with explicit instruction and varied activities for decoding and encoding one-syllable and multisyllabic words in both isolation and connected text.
- 5.E.4 Morphological Awareness: Materials systematically introduce grade-level morphemes, with explicit instruction and varied activities for recognizing, decoding, encoding, and comprehending words with morphemes in both isolation and connected text.
Challenges
- 1.1 Course-Level Design: Materials do not outline the TEKS, ELPS, and knowledge taught. They do not include suggested pacing, a rationale for unit order, or support for unit internalization.
- 1.2 Unit-Level Design: Materials do not include a comprehensive unit overview, provide content knowledge and academic vocabulary for effective teaching, or suggestions to support families in their students' success.
- 1.3 Lesson-Level Design: Materials do not include comprehensive, detailed lesson plans to meet language standards or lesson overviews listing necessary materials for lesson delivery.
- 2.1 Instructional Assessments: Materials lack a variety of unit-level assessments aligned to standards and objectives.
- 2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring: Materials do not include tools for students to track their progress and growth.
- 3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds: Materials do not include guidance for differentiated instruction, including activities and support for students below or above grade-level proficiency, pre-teaching or embedded supports for unfamiliar vocabulary or references.
- 3.2 Instructional Methods: Materials do not provide multiple types of student practice or teacher guidance on recommended structures.
- 3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students: Materials do not provide educators with guidance on linguistic accommodations, bilingual/ESL program implementation, or support for emergent bilingual students.
- 4.2 Daily Instructional Sequence and Routines: Daily lessons lack explicit guided instruction, immediate corrective feedback, and opportunities for collaborative learning.
- 4.5 Progress Monitoring and Student Support: Materials do not guidance on the frequency of progress monitoring based on student strengths and on using data to accelerate learning and achieve mastery.
- 5.B.1 Oral Language Development: Materials do not provide explicit and systematic guidance for developing oral language through diverse methods.
- 5.C.1 Alphabet Knowledge: Materials do not provide guidance for explicit instruction in uppercase letters.
- 5.C.2 Letter-Sound Correspondence: Materials do not provide teacher guidance for connecting phonemes to letters in words with explanatory feedback.
- 5.E.1 Sound-Spelling Patterns: The materials lack guidance for explicit instruction on grade-level sound-spelling patterns, as well as activities and resources for developing and applying these patterns in decodable text.
- 5.E.2 Regular and Irregular High-Frequency Words: Materials do not systematically introduce and provide explicit instruction for regular high-frequency words.
Summary
Institute for Multi-Sensory Education (IMSE) Comprehensive Orton-Gillingham Plus is an English phonics K–3 program. The program offers explicit and systematic instruction in phonics. It includes activities and resources to support the development of students' phonics, morphology, decoding, and encoding skills. The instructional materials provide guidance through scripted lessons and simple and repetitive routines and procedures for teachers to follow in every lesson. Additionally, the program includes opportunities for students to develop phonics skills in isolation and in context with aligned decodable passages for each concept.
Campus and district instructional leaders should consider the following:
- The product offers a structured approach to phonics, including a clear sequence for introducing morphemes, syllable types, and syllable division to help students with multisyllabic words. It also has built-in chances to develop, practice, and reinforce these skills. However, it does not cover regular and irregular high-frequency words for grade 3.
- While the product provides good support with detailed teacher guidance, scripted lessons, daily routines, teacher modeling, and assessment tools, it does not provide guidance for differentiating instruction, enrichment, or extension based on student needs. Additionally, there are not many opportunities for students to work together collaboratively.