Instructional Materials Review and Approval

Statistics and Probability with Applications

Math Grade 10

IMRA 2024
Commissioner Rejected

Publisher: Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishing Group

Copyright: 2024

Quality Review

Standards Alignment

Rubric Section
Grade TEKS Student % TEKS Teacher % ELPS Student % ELPS Teacher %
Grade 9 97.73% 97.73% 100% 100%

Criteria for Quality

Rubric Section 1 Intentional Instructional Design Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional course, unit, and lesson-level design. Total TOTAL25% (13 out of 53 points) 25%
Section 1 Intentional Instructional Design Materials support educators in effective implementation through intentional course, unit, and lesson-level design. Total 25% (13 out of 53 points)

1.1 Course-Level Design

1.1a
Materials include a scope and sequence outlining the TEKS, ELPS, concepts, and knowledge taught in the course.
0 out of 5 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1b
Materials include suggested pacing (pacing guide/calendar) to support effective implementation for various instructional calendars (e.g., varying numbers of instructional days – 165, 180, 210).
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1c
Materials include an explanation for the rationale of unit order as well as how concepts to be learned connect throughout the course.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1d
Materials include guidance, protocols, and/or templates for unit and lesson internalization.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.1e
Materials include resources and guidance to support administrators and instructional coaches with implementing the materials as designed.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2 Unit-Level Design

1.2a
Materials include comprehensive unit overviews that provide the background content knowledge and academic vocabulary necessary to effectively teach the concepts in the unit.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.2b
Materials contain supports for families in both Spanish and English for each unit with suggestions on supporting the progress of their student.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3 Lesson-Level Design

1.3a
Materials include comprehensive, structured, detailed lesson plans that include daily objectives, questions, tasks, materials, and instructional assessments required to meet the content and language standards of the lesson.
0 out of 30 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3b
Materials include a lesson overview outlining the suggested timing for each lesson component.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3c
Materials include a lesson overview listing the teacher and student materials necessary to effectively deliver the lesson.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

1.3d
Materials include guidance on the effective use of lesson materials for extended practice (e.g., homework, extension, enrichment).
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 2 Progress Monitoring Materials support educators in effective implementation through frequent, strategic opportunities to monitor and respond to student progress. Total TOTAL32% (9 out of 28 points) 32%
Section 2 Progress Monitoring Materials support educators in effective implementation through frequent, strategic opportunities to monitor and respond to student progress. Total 32% (9 out of 28 points)

2.1 Instructional Assessments

2.1a
Materials include a variety of instructional assessments at the unit and lesson level (including diagnostic, formative, and summative) that vary in types of tasks and questions.
6 out of 12 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1b
Materials include the definition and intended purpose for the types of instructional assessments included.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1c
Materials include teacher guidance to ensure consistent and accurate administration of instructional assessments.
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1d
Diagnostic, formative, and summative assessments are aligned to the TEKS and objectives of the course, unit, or lesson.
0 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.1e
Instructional assessments include standards-aligned items at varying levels of complexity.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2 Data Analysis and Progress Monitoring

2.2a
Instructional assessments and scoring information provide guidance for interpreting and responding to student performance.
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2b
Materials provide guidance for the use of included tasks and activities to respond to student trends in performance on assessments.
0 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

2.2c
Materials include tools for students to track their own progress and growth.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 3 Supports for All Learners Materials support educators in reaching all learners through design focused on engagement, representation, and action/expression for learner variability. Total TOTAL56% (18 out of 32 points) 56%
Section 3 Supports for All Learners Materials support educators in reaching all learners through design focused on engagement, representation, and action/expression for learner variability. Total 56% (18 out of 32 points)

3.1 Differentiation and Scaffolds

3.1a
Materials include teacher guidance for differentiated instruction, activities, and/or paired (scaffolded) lessons for students who have not yet reached proficiency on grade-level content and skills.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1b
Materials include pre-teaching or embedded supports for unfamiliar vocabulary and references in text (e.g., figurative language, idioms, academic language).
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.1c
Materials include teacher guidance for differentiated instruction, enrichment, and extension activities for students who have demonstrated proficiency in grade-level content and skills.
1 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2 Instructional Methods

3.2a
Materials include prompts and guidance to support the teacher in modeling, explaining, and communicating the concept(s) to be learned directly and explicitly.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2b
Materials include teacher guidance and recommendations for effective lesson delivery and facilitation using a variety of instructional approaches.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.2c
Materials support multiple types of practice (e.g., guided, independent, collaborative) and include guidance for teachers and recommended structures (e.g., whole group, small group, individual) to support effective implementation.
2 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3 Support for Emergent Bilingual Students

3.3a
Materials include teacher guidance on providing linguistic accommodations for various levels of language proficiency [as defined by the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)], which are designed to engage students in using increasingly more academic language.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3b
Materials include implementation guidance to support teachers in effectively using the materials in state-approved bilingual/ESL programs.
0 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3c
Materials include embedded guidance for teachers to support emergent bilingual students in developing academic vocabulary, increasing comprehension, building background knowledge, and making cross-linguistic connections through oral and written discourse.
0 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

3.3d
If designed for dual language immersion (DLI) programs, materials include resources that outline opportunities to address metalinguistic transfer from English to the partner language.
Not scored

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 4 Depth and Coherence of Key Concepts Materials are designed to meet the rigor of the standards while connecting concepts within and across grade levels/courses. Total TOTAL87% (20 out of 23 points) 87%
Section 4 Depth and Coherence of Key Concepts Materials are designed to meet the rigor of the standards while connecting concepts within and across grade levels/courses. Total 87% (20 out of 23 points)

4.1 Depth of Key Concepts

4.1a
Practice opportunities over the course of a lesson and/or unit (including instructional assessments) require students to demonstrate depth of understanding aligned to the TEKS.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.1b
Questions and tasks progressively increase in rigor and complexity, leading to grade-level proficiency in the mathematics standards.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2 Coherence of Key Concepts

4.2a
Materials demonstrate coherence across courses/grade bands through a logically sequenced and connected scope and sequence.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2b
Materials demonstrate coherence across units by explicitly connecting patterns, big ideas, and relationships between mathematical concepts.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2c
Materials demonstrate coherence across units by connecting the content and language learned in previous courses/grade levels and what will be learned in future courses/grade levels to the content to be learned in the current course/grade level.
2 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.2d
Materials demonstrate coherence at the lesson level by connecting students’ prior knowledge of concepts and procedures from the current and prior grade level(s) to new mathematical knowledge and skills.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.3 Spaced and Interleaved Practice

4.3a
Materials provide spaced retrieval opportunities with previously learned skills and concepts across lessons and units.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

4.3b
Materials provide interleaved practice opportunities with previously learned skills and concepts across lessons and units.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 5 Balance of Conceptual and Procedural Understanding Materials are designed to balance conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and fluency. Total TOTAL79% (52 out of 66 points) 79%
Section 5 Balance of Conceptual and Procedural Understanding Materials are designed to balance conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and fluency. Total 79% (52 out of 66 points)

5.1 Development of Conceptual Understanding

5.1a
Questions and tasks require students to interpret, analyze, and evaluate a variety of models and representations for mathematical concepts and situations.
12 out of 12 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.1b
Questions and tasks require students to create a variety of models to represent mathematical situations.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.1c
Questions and tasks provide opportunities for students to apply conceptual understanding to new problem situations and contexts.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2 Development of Fluency

5.2a
Materials provide tasks that are designed to build student automaticity and fluency necessary to complete grade-level tasks.
2 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2b
Materials provide opportunities for students to practice the application of efficient, flexible, and accurate mathematical procedures within the lesson and/or throughout a unit.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2c
Materials provide opportunities for students to evaluate procedures, processes, and solutions for efficiency, flexibility, and accuracy within the lesson and throughout a unit.
2 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.2d
Materials contain embedded supports for teachers to guide students toward increasingly efficient approaches.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3 Balance of Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Fluency

5.3a
Materials explicitly state how the conceptual and procedural emphasis of the TEKS are addressed.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3b
Questions and tasks include the use of concrete models and manipulatives, pictorial representation (figures/drawings), and abstract representations.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.3c
Materials include supports for students in connecting, creating, defining, and explaining concrete and representational models to abstract (symbolic/numeric/algorithmic) concepts.
8 out of 8 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4 Development of Academic Mathematical Language

5.4a
Materials provide opportunities for students to develop their academic mathematical language using visuals, manipulatives, and other language development strategies.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4b
Materials include embedded guidance for the teacher addressing scaffolding and supporting student development and use of academic mathematical vocabulary in context.
1 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.4c
Materials include embedded guidance for the teacher to support the application of appropriate mathematical language to include vocabulary, syntax, and discourse to include guidance to support mathematical conversations that provide opportunities for students to hear, refine, and use math language with peers and develop their math language toolkit over time as well as guide teachers to support student responses using exemplar responses to questions and tasks.
7 out of 9 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5 Process Standards Connections

5.5a
Process standards are integrated appropriately into the materials.
1 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5b
Materials include a description of how process standards are incorporated and connected throughout the course.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5c
Materials include a description for each unit of how process standards are incorporated and connected throughout the unit.
0 out of 2 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

5.5d
Materials include an overview of the process standards incorporated into each lesson.
0 out of 1 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Rubric Section 6 Productive Struggle Materials support students in applying disciplinary practices to productive problem-solving, including explaining and revising their thinking. Total TOTAL68% (17 out of 25 points) 68%
Section 6 Productive Struggle Materials support students in applying disciplinary practices to productive problem-solving, including explaining and revising their thinking. Total 68% (17 out of 25 points)

6.1 Student Self-Efficacy

6.1a
Materials provide opportunities for students to think mathematically, persevere through solving problems, and to make sense of mathematics.
3 out of 3 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1b
Materials support students in understanding, explaining, and justifying that there can be multiple ways to solve problems and complete tasks.
4 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.1c
Materials are designed to require students to make sense of mathematics through doing, writing about, and discussing math with peers and teachers.
6 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2 Facilitating Productive Struggle

6.2a
Materials support teachers in guiding students to share and reflect on their problem-solving approaches, including explanations, arguments, and justifications.
0 out of 6 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

6.2b
Materials offer prompts and guidance to assist teachers in providing explanatory feedback based on student responses and anticipated misconceptions.
4 out of 4 points

See Quality Review Evidence for this Indicator

Program Information

Copyright Type
Proprietary
Print Version
Estimated number of pages:
Digital Version
Estimated number of click or scroll pages:
back to top